Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Culver

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Jonathan Culver]]=

:{{la|Jonathan Culver}} ([{{fullurl:Jonathan Culver|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Culver}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Apparently non-notable self-published author. None of the [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22jonathan+culver%22 Google News hits] for Jonathan Culver appear to refer to this person, who doesn't appear to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Gonzonoir (talk) 18:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete and salt Wikipedia is not for self promotion. No indication of notability that would meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete - No reliable sources and no notability! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable at all. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom (I don't know about salting, though). THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom, no salting needed. Royal broil 05:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.