Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan L. Howard

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Jonathan L. Howard]]=

:{{la|Jonathan L. Howard}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_L._Howard Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jonathan L. Howard}})

No evidence of notability. (Sourced only to a blog and a page at the "publishersweekly" web site.) PROD was removed without any explanation. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

~~weak either way~~ Keep (thx to added reviews) Author of fantasy fiction. Books held in 200-500 libraries in Worldcat. Published by Doubleday (respectable publisher). Two books reviewed in Booklist [http://booklistonline.com/Johannes-Cabal-The-Fear-Institute-Jonathan-L-Howard/pid=6239116], [http://booklistonline.com/Johannes-Cabal-the-Necromancer-Jonathan-L-Howard/pid=3440299]. Excerpted by NPR (for some reason) [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128194035]. Lots of fantasy fiction blogs and sites. I cannot find neutral sources, however. It's very weak for an author, and I could support either a keep or a delete with this evidence. LaMona (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep. I found quite a few reviews out there for his work, so he would pass notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There are now plenty of references to reviews in reliable sources of his work, which is sufficient sourcing to write an article about him as an author. Sandstein 07:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.