Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Schlansky

:{{la|Jordan Schlansky}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jordan_Schlansky Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jordan Schlansky}})

J^♯m (talk | contribs) 00:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

:The article in its current form is unambiguously terrible. It could possibly be improved, but right now it looks like a huge BLP issue. SOFIXIT? I'm not interested. It looks like it fails N, so I'd rather just delete. If someone else cares to carry the torch forward and make it usable, I could even be persuaded to vote KEEP. J^♯m (talk | contribs) 00:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

:I'll vote to keep. He seems notable enough to have a wiki page, just need some TLC, I'll try to add on to it this weekend perhaps.01:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)AlaskanNativeRU (talk)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable figure involved in television production.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. No improvements have been made despite the offer by {{u|AlaskanNativeRU}}. I am not convinced this guy passes WP:GNG. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.