Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Arauz

:{{la|Jorge Arauz}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jorge_Arauz Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jorge Arauz}})

Self-authored puff piece/curriculum vitae for a non-notable publishing industry person. If you have any doubt about who wrote it: the entire thing is the work of an SPA called {{user|EditingMaxposure}}, and as you can see the subject of this article is the boss of Maxposure Media Group. Put his name into Google and you get zilch - apart from this article, of course. It looks like it has a lot of references, but they're mostly bad or refer to the company, not the guy. — Scott • talk 23:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

• Redirect - Subject is not himself the focus of multiple pieces of independently-published journalism which would allow for verifiability. Leaving a redirect will allow those searching for the name to find what they need to know on the company page — which is presumably a notable subject. Carrite (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
• :I'm weakly okay with that as well, although it's not my preferred option. — Scott • talk 16:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Olaf Davis (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

---

• Redirect to Maxposure Media Group. Source searches demonstrate that the subject does not meet WP:BASIC. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
• {{ping|Northamerica1000}} Quick question - if he's not notable enough for an article, why is he notable enough for a redirect? — Scott • talk 17:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
• The subject's name is a potential search term. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
• Redirect to Maxposure Media Group: Redirects are cheap, and that article does legitimately give some information about him. PWilkinson (talk) 16:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.