Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Urban

:{{la|Josef Urban}} ([{{fullurl:Josef Urban|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Urban}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

An active young computer scientist but does not yet pass WP:PROF. A recent PhD (2004), modest citability record according to GoogleScholar[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Josef+Urban%22+&btnG=Search] and WebOfScience. No other major achievements listed. The second prize in the [http://www.ontologyportal.org/reasoning.html SUMO reasoning prize competition] is good but not sufficient for passing WP:PROF at this point. Nsk92 (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
• Delete May very well become notable in a few years, but as outlined by Nsk92 is not yet at that point. --Crusio (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. WP is not a directory of assistant professors. No mention of Urban online in Czech language sources. (Note that Josef is common Czech first name and Urban common surname.) The article for an [http://www.answers.com/topic/josef-urban Austrian architect] could be created instead. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 12:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence that he passes WP:PROF. The citation record looks decent for his level of seniority, but far from enough to override the default presumption that junior faculty are insufficiently notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.