Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Dear

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Joseph Dear]]=

:{{la|Joseph Dear}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Dear Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Joseph Dear}})

I found no significant coverage per WP:BIO. SL93 (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:BIO. Only source provided comes from an obituary. Additional sources would need to be provided in order to meet WP:BIO guidelines. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete - an obit by itself could be a reliable source, but does not determine notability per se, unless it's a feature such as The New York Times. I don't see how a CIO of a state agency, even a big one, is automatically notable. Bearian (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.