Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Reylan B. Viray

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

=[[Joseph Reylan B. Viray]]=

:{{la|Joseph Reylan B. Viray}} ([{{fullurl:Joseph Reylan B. Viray|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Reylan B. Viray}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Notability issues, cited references aren't as established either. The person's works are not as significant outside the university. Axxand (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Definitely not notable. Failing to meet guidelines. ApprenticeFan (talk) 02:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —ApprenticeFan (talk) 02:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete per WP:YOURSELF. Appears to be an autobiography. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete: do Filipinos know him? I guess not. Alexius08 (talk) 09:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Written like an autobio, presented like a work resume. Starczamora (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Viray's works have not been recognized by mainstream press, or have been given awards to suffice this person's notability. --Efe (talk) 01:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.