Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephine Kime
=[[Josephine Kime]]=
:{{la|Josephine Kime}} – (
:({{Find sources|Josephine Kime}})
Searched on Google, could not find anything, tagged as hoax, OR etc. Round Maple (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable. She appears to be a young hopeful, and has not yet reached the level Wikipedia requires to merit an article. I'm puzzled by the nominator's comments, though. Why conclude that she does not exist? The CV is plausible, and the Google search provides a consistent set of hits which are promotional in nature and entirely what I would expect for somebody trying to make her way in the field of entertainment. --AJHingston (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. That being said, she does exist, and a human interest story about her getting kicked of a bus for being "too tall" verifies the basic facts of her life. The article is excessively tagged and templated in an effort to make it go away, I guess. Articles should be tagged judiciously, not indiscriminately. Cullen328 (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Nominator is a new account, blocked already as one of the many socks of User:Crouch, Swayle. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.