Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Reaume

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 20:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Josh Reaume]]=

:{{la|Josh Reaume}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Josh Reaume}})

deletion rationale: As a non-professional development driver, he has not received the recognition needed to meet WP:ATHLETE. Sources provided are not sufficient to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Contested PROD. 66.57.4.150 (talk) 14:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

(Finishing nom for unregistered editor. No opinion (yet) on deletion.) Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

*Weak Keep, subject of article meets general notability guidelines, but not by much, with additional references could be changed to KEEP, but I can understand why this doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

:Changing my vote due to delete, due to further review, and not meeting part 1 of basic criteria. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

  • I have added additional references. Take a look and tell me what you think. This should give some more credibility with regards to the WP:ATHLETE. --(talk) 7:31pm Oct 12, 2009. —Preceding undated comment added 02:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC).
  • Weak Keep - just meets WP:GNG. The article needs a re-write, fix the tone and style. Crafty (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Delete per those below. Crafty (talk) 05:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

:Question: How does the article show that GNG has been meet? The refs list his name - nothing else. No significant coverage has been provided ("sources a008-01-24ddress the subject directly in detail"). 66.57.4.150 (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

::Well it doesn't if one actually reads WP:GNG. Frankly it's rather inconvenient of you to point that out. Crafty (talk) 05:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete, and encourage those arguing to keep to recheck the sources. The six "reference" sources have literally no more mention of him than his name in a list. Of the external links, one is his self-published website, the second doesn't even mention his name, and the third had a directory entry. The general notability guideline requires not only that there be a good number of sources, but that those sources be substantive. There's nothing substantive here. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep The entry is constantly undergoing improvement. Talk to me 00:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)— thisiswar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete He's only a local driver at this point who competes at one of the many NASCAR-sanctioned local tracks throughout the United States. It would be different if he were a developmental driver for a NASCAR Cup team, but he's not according to the article. Royalbroil 01:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.