Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Pellicer (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

=[[Joshua Pellicer]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Pellicer}}

:{{la|Joshua Pellicer}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Pellicer (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Joshua Pellicer}})

:{{Vandal|EdrevEpac}}

American dating coach. No evidence of substantial coverage. Only claim of notability is to have appeared on TV a few times. Fails WP:BIO. A few SPAs and suspected paid editors have been involved in creating these 'seduction community' type articles. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Harbinger. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Redirect to The Art of Charm which has significant coverage on secondary sources including msnbc, and significant coverage in New York Press [http://www.nypress.com/article-19389-charmed-im-sure.html]. A definite keep per WP:NOTE. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 03:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete No significant coverage by any source. The New York Press article linked above mentions him in passing twice - that's not significant coverage. We've not found a single source about Pellicer that meets WP:BIO, instead a few sources that mention him in passing. --Ronz (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::Simply not true, I viewed the significant coverage, and noted it above. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 16:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Not true?! You think there are more than two sentences mentioning him? That the two sentences constitute significant coverage? --Ronz (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::The sources are more about what he does than about him, so we might want to redirect to an article on his school. But they are real sources. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 16:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I'm glad we cleared that up. You'll be changing your recommendation then from Keep to Redirect?

:::::How about redirecting to The Art of Charm? --Ronz (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:N. The mentioned articles are so brief in regards to this person that they can hardly serve as reliable sources. Likeminas (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Article did seem to get some partisan editing in regards to supporters of this Jordan_Harbinger guy who is no more notabler and should also go to deletion...better deleted, imo I object to a redirect of this persons name as it was a not notable association as per this AFD. marginal notability, as a duty of care to the living subject.Off2riorob (talk) 20:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.