Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joslyn Fox
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 19:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Joslyn Fox]]=
:{{la|Joslyn Fox}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Joslyn Fox}})
Performer fails WP:GNG. The article is mainly about her participation in RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6). Underpaid Intern (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Underpaid Intern (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 10. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per GNG. Yes, the article needs to be expanded, but [https://instinctmagazine.com/drag-race-joslyn-fox-reveals-never-do-all-stars/ coverage of the subject] continues into 2021 and is not limited to their appearance on the TV show. Also, I've asked the nominator to slow down on the RPDR contestant deletion noms. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
::::As there is already a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Nicky_Doll_AfD_nomination about this, I don't understand how your comment is relevant to this nomination. I have already asked you to point me to guidelines about the number of AfD that one can nominate, but as of now you still haven't. I don't think this comment adds any value to this nomination or demonstrates that I am not following guidelines. --Underpaid Intern (talk) 18:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
::::* {{u|Underpaid Intern}}, Well, you're not exactly following the process correctly by nominating this article for being "mainly about her participation in RuPaul's Drag Race". You're basing your argument on the current article's text, not all available coverage of the subject. No one would dispute these articles need to be expanded, but just because they are stubs does not mean the topics are not notable. WP:BEFORE. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Echoing Another Believer's rationale: coverage of the subject has continued years after their initial appearance on RPDR. [https://instinctmagazine.com/drag-race-joslyn-fox-reveals-never-do-all-stars/ This] 2021 Instinct piece mentioned above calls the subject "beloved"; [https://www.worcestermag.com/story/entertainment/2021/04/14/five-things-do-jimmy-cash-drag-queens-and-more/7147754002/ This] 2021 piece shows the subject made the cover of Worcester Magazine; there's [https://www.telegram.com/entertainmentlife/20190228/from-drag-race-to-airspray-joslyn-fox-keeps-music-spinning this] 2019 Worcester Telegram piece; there's [https://www.telegram.com/article/20160324/news/160329485 this] 2016 piece from the Worcester Telegram; etc. Then there's the coverage in relation to their appearance on the show, including coverage from The Advocate [https://www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/television/2014/04/25/last-words-rupauls-drag-races-joslyn-fox here]; Boston.com [http://archive.boston.com/lifestyle/blogs/bostonspirit/2014/03/worcester_girl_on_rupauls_drag.html here]; and much more. Overall, I'd say this passes GNG. --Kbabej (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.