Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal on Aviation Technology

:{{la|Journal on Aviation Technology}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Journal_on_Aviation_Technology Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Journal on Aviation Technology}})

Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. - MrX 12:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete See other responses of mine to this line of journals. LaMona (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Physics and Applications. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete: no evidence of notability. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete: No assertion of notability (or significant content in the article) - with just an infobox and nothing else. No evidence that the article meets GNG or other notability guidelines.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as I found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.