Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jovan Milic
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Jovan Milic]]=
:{{la|Jovan Milic}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Jovan Milic}})
this is a borderline hoax with falsely inflated importance and if I had to guess, an autobio. The awards (as per [https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%A7%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5/%D0%90%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0_51#%D0%88%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%9B srwiki]) are basically tabloid reported. The rest is mostly made up. (Seriously, the Jedi Knight Award?) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NAUTHOR, etc...the sole claim of notability here, which is dubious, an award from the President of Serbia, is sourced to an unreliable source and I doubt the notability of a service award on it's own.
A search of his name in his native language gives even less in terms of sourcing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
You can delete this page. When the Corona crisis passes, I will do my best to improve the branches and my work on Wikipedia. Sorry. - Daca 1234 18.58, 16 August 2020 (CET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daca1234 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Corona virus or not the subject falls well short of notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MILL and WP:SIGCOV - and WP:SNOW since he's conceded. It's possible autobiography, certainly a resume, and has done nothing of note to warrant significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. This person has been editing for four years, and should know the rues by now that we are not a resume service or LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 23:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a defeted candidate who would not be notable even if he had won. His role in science is clearly not at a level to confer notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as a creator i agree. He need to do more to be on wikipedia. Sorry for my mistake. I am 4 years here, but im not active all of that years. Again sorry. Daca1234 18.27, 22 August 2020 (CET) —Preceding undated comment added 16:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.