Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozeff

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete (A7). -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 09:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Jozeff]]=

:{{la|Jozeff}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jozeff Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jozeff}})

Does not meet WP:GNG. Article attempts to inherit notability from events the person was involved with, and sources located during WP:BEFORE search offer no evidence of individual notability. Improvement tags repeatedly removed by author without making any effort to address this issue. Exemplo347 (talk) 07:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy delete (A7). Fails WP:MUSICBIO among others.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Echoing both the nom and Kupdung's comments (I'd say speedy but it keeps getting declined anyway...) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

::Hi {{reply to|Chrissymad}} I'm happy to explain myself here - the Speedy was first declined by me, when the article was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jozeff&oldid=770522156 at this stage], because I was hoping the article creator would be able to flesh out the claims they had made. Unfortunately, all they did was remove improvement templates and make the article worse, which is why I support deletion of this article despite declining a Speedy Delete under WP:A7. I hope this makes sense! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.