Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bond

:{{la|Julia Bond}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Julia_Bond Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Julia Bond}})

Fails PORNBIO and Gng. Appearing on Jerry springer and a bit part do not make you notable. blps should have better sourcing then this. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

• Keep - notable. Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 12:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:*This entry will be invalidated per WP:ITSNOTABLE. Tarc (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Bit-part mainstream appearances don't satisfy PORNBIO. Lacks non-trivial independent RS coverage to satisfy GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as unfortunately fails PORNBIO. –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Minor appearances in actual films, doe snot meet pornbio either. Tarc (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per nom's accurate analysis. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.