Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Solomon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Julie Solomon]]=

:{{la|1=Julie Solomon}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Julie Solomon}})

Nothing cited in the article counts towards WP:GNG, and I can find nothing better online. Her husband is notable, and almost all coverage in reliable sources is really about him - see WP:NOTINHERITED. Run-of-the-mill businessperson. Promotional article, created by a blocked sock WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 10:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

::{{u|Edwardx}} I don't agree with the lack of notability assessment. Is the etiquette for me to provide notability citations in this talk page or edit the article directly to include the citations? e.g. https://www.success.com/author/julie-solomon/ Matchbox23 (talk) 05:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

::: I would like the deciding administrator to be aware that tensions between wiki editors and this person's husband erupted last week over the Johnathon Schaech page editing. To remove the page immediately following those events may appear retaliatory. Matchbox23 (talk) 06:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

:::Yes, you can link useful sources, see the "Introduction to deletion process" link above. The "Success" ref doesn't help the argument for "keep", since it's not independent of the subject (somewhat obviously). WP:BASIC may be of help to you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Lacks sigcov from third party sources. -KH-1 (talk) 05:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Strong Delete per nom. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 17:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.