Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 20/Births

:{{la|July 20/Births}} ([{{fullurl:July 20/Births|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 20/Births}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Appears to be an orphaned test article. No other articles of this sort exist. Duplicate of information on July 20 or indiscriminate information that is not/can not be listed on July 20.

Also nominating the following related articles:

:{{la|July_20/Events1}}

:{{la|July_20/Events2}}

:{{la|July_20/Deaths}} -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 19:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

• Delete all. It's possible that in 2005 this was an experiment at breaking up the existing article July 20 into its components. However, even at 34 megabytes, that July 20 article isn't all that cumbersome and splitting it up has proved unnecessary. Indeed, if any article shouldn't be broken up, the July 20 (or any other day) article would be an example of something that ain't broke and don't fix it. It's not a bad idea for someone to check to see if there's any birth, death, or event that got added to one of these lists and not to to the main article. Mandsford (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Aside from other concerns, this name is also problematic because of its format: it fails the statement on Wikipedia:Naming conventions under the header "Do not use an article name that suggests a hierarchy of articles." As such, it's nto a likely target, so after ensuring that all this information is on the actual 20 July article. Nyttend (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.