Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbune
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under WP:G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion) and WP:G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement). — Newslinger talk 12:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Jumbune]]=
:{{la|Jumbune}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Jumbune}})
Jumbune is a non-notable product created by the apparently non-notable company Impetus Technologies. I could only find one RS about Jumbune: [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/impetus-open-source-solution-jumbune-120000430.html]. Thus it fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. userdude 08:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. userdude 08:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. userdude 08:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. userdude 08:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
{{Comment}} Correction: the Yahoo! Finance article is not a reliable source. It is written by Impetus Big Data. ({{tq|To learn more about Impetus Big Data offerings, visit bigdata.impetus.com or write to us at bigdata@impetus.com.}})userdude 08:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: An article created by one :WP:SPA and subsequently edited by another, setting out the product features in the matter of a brochure. Searches are finding routine listings but not the coverage required to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 09:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep:
My apologies - I forgot to fill out the citations after I created the article.
Jumbune is a product of Impetus Technolgies Inc. Impetus got founded in 1991, head quarterd at Los Gatos, CA, is a partner of number of Fortune 100 clients.
These are the authentic sources for your reference:
[https://www.impetus.com/company Impetus Information]
[https://www.impetus.com/content/impetus%E2%80%99-open-source-solution-jumbune%E2%84%A2-accelerate-hadoop-based-solution-development Jumbune on Impetus Press Release]
[http://jumbune.com/about-us.html Jumbune about us]
[https://github.com/Impetus/jumbuneOpen Source commits of the product on Github - open source repository]
[https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-ca/marketplace/apps/impetus-infotech-india-pvt-ltd.impetus_jumbune?tab=OverviewJumbune listed on Microsoft Azure Cloud Marketplace]
[https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/Impetus-Technologies-Inc-Jumbune-for-AWS/B07ZTWW81SJumbune listed on Amazon AWS Cloud Marketplace]
[http://jumbune.com Jumbune website]
:* None of the above sources is considered reliable for Wikipedia. In short, you need coverage in media with editorial oversight (eg. a review in published/online magazine, chapter in book by respected author/publisher etc.) to prove notability of the article subject. Blog posts, adverts, social media posts, company webpage etc. aren´t reliable sources. Pavlor (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- IEEE Symposium Paper:
:* Thanks for the pointers. Here is one such research citation [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299474654_Big_Data_Validation_and_Quality_Assurance_-_Issuses_Challenges_and_NeedsHere's a listing in IEEE research paper about Jumbune] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayankmishra (talk • contribs) 15:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
:::It looks this paper was not submited for peer-review (conference paper only), I don´t think this confers much notability to the article subject. Pavlor (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
:* Jumbune is also enlisted in Microsoft Azure documentation as notable app to extend Azure cluster.
[https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/hdinsight-apps-install-applications Jumbune on Microsoft Azure] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkanungo (talk • contribs) 06:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
:::The listing in Microsoft Azure documentation appears to be a routine list of all published Apache Hadoop applications, not indicative of notability. In general, information about a product belongs on the article of the company behind the product (see WP:NPRODUCT). However, I believe both the product and the company fail WP:COMPANY and WP:GNG—for starters, all sources that can be used to determine notability must be independent of the subject. userdude 22:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.