Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junaid Azim Mattu

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Junaid Azim Mattu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Junaid_Azim_Mattu Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Junaid Azim Mattu}})

The four sources presented in the article is insufficient to pass our notability guidelines. The article fails WP:NPOL, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:POLOUTCOMES. He is the mayor of a city with 1,800,000 people, and that city is capital of the territory. The city he is mayor should fall under "regional prominence" stated in POLOUTCOMES. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
• Keep per Iamreallygoodatcheckers. —Мандичка^YO 😜 12:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
• Keep Popularly elected mayor of Srinagar. The sources already existing in the article appear sufficient to write a more that "he exists" article about the subject. Passes WP:NPOL. --Enos733 (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. Mayor of a major city. Enough to pass WP:NPOL. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 21:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
• Keep per past precedent. We almost always keep the popularly-elected mayors of large cities, especially ones that are regionally important and having millions of residents. This compares, to a mayor elected by the city council of a city of 1/4 million residents, which would not be automatically notable. I would also argue that Srinagar is important as a major pilgrimage site of several religions, even though it's not as well known in the United States. Bearian (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.