Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jung Se-woon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Jung Se-woon]]=

:{{la|Jung Se-woon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jung_Se-woon Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jung Se-woon}})

Fails individual notability criterias outside of group, badly sourced article (allkpop.com is unreliable per WP:Korea) Snowflake91 (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

::*Delete: A badly sourced article in which the individual has not done or partaken in anything notable enough for them to have an article. Abdotorg (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 01:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.