Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Orange Bowl (tennis)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

=[[Junior Orange Bowl (tennis)]]=

:{{la|Junior Orange Bowl (tennis)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Junior Orange Bowl (tennis)}})

Contested PROD. There is nothing here to suggest notability of this tournament. There are certainly a lot of famous names as winners, but notability is not inherited. The Dunlop Orange Bowl for 16-and-under and 18-and-under is certainly notable, but not this tournament. St Anselm (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —St Anselm (talk) 04:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

My understanding is that the Junior Orange Bowl was renamed at some point as the Dunlop Orange Bowl. The Junior Orange Bowl should probably be merged into the Dunlop Orange Bowl since the past champions sections in both is not complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rnr7144 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

::That's likely not true, and even if it were, since 1962 these have been clearly two separate tournaments that today go by these two different names (though it is confusing that the Dunlop Orange Bowl is a junior tournament and the Junior Orange Bowl is a youth one). Along the lines of this suggestion though, I think the past winners list for the Dunlop Orange Bowl should most likely include the prior to 1962 champions for U-13, particularly if this nominated page is deleted. Mayumashu (talk) 12:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Keep and improve. This is the leading tournament in the world for under-14s. I know that, and I'm neither American nor a tennis fan, just a British general sports fan. Alex Middleton (talk) 00:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 23:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Delete: As nominator said, notability is not inherited. Even if there are elite players names connected to it, but still tournament itself is not notable enough. — Bill william compton^Talk 03:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.