Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Rich Gates

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Just Rich Gates]]=

:{{la|Just Rich Gates}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Just_Rich_Gates Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Just Rich Gates}})

Spammy and weakly sourced article fails WP:NMUSIC. Careful about clicking on the links in the References! Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Logical Cowboy, How you say this article is spammy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji E.M (talk • contribs) 05:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep It is spammy but this guy recorded with Waka Flocka Flame so I'd say keep but watch.98.221.118.184 (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)(edit to add that is me/my IP saying KEEP above as well)2601:C:6783:6A01:C80C:A620:F3FB:D718 (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (address) @ 20:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete- very few of the sources look that good. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete per above and Fails WP:NMUSIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep this artist is credited on many other artist's prominent recordings. I have a COI in that while looking for info about this artist, I noticed a domain that was heavily-linked that they actually did not own-so I bought it cheap. (full disclosure) That link is not a part of the article. Yes this article was created by a paid-editing spammer who subsequently disclosed that on their page, (I still don't know exactly how I feel about that).....but 1)-we don't really know WHO paid to have the article created, so why "punish" the subject? I worked on the article a little, but as far as the references to track-samples and players, I really do not know what is WP-proper for artists in this category. I tweeked this up with category, NPOV, and fact-checking, but I refrained-from adding extensive youtube --or--any--youtube linking, like I said, I just don't know enough about musical artists to know what would be acceptable, so I am only linking like I would for a "regular" article. Internal links and connections on WP, and reliable sources.2601:C:6783:6A01:C80C:A620:F3FB:D718 (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment So, basically, there are two keep votes from the same IP, who admits a COI, and whose best reason to keep is that the guy recorded with Waka Flocka Flame! Lol. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.