Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Capră
=[[Justin Capră]]=
:{{la|Justin Capră}} – (
:({{Find sources|Justin Capră}})
Insufficient assertion of notability. (Inventor with no patents and no production devices.) RJFJR (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete an inventor with no patented or commercially produced inventions is about as non-notable as it's possible to get. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- It is possible that "designer" might be better than "inventor". It is unfortuantely not clear from the article when he was most active. If this was before 1989, the lack of patents is hardly surprising, since Communist governments did not (I think) believe in them. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
:Whether we call him an "inventor" or a "designer" is completely irrelevant. Lack of patents is not central to the issue anyway: none of the things he invented (or designed) has gone into production, and there is no evidence that he has received substantial coverage in reliable sources, whether or not he has patents. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.