Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyväskylä Sinfonia

:{{la|Jyväskylä Sinfonia}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jyv%C3%A4skyl%C3%A4_Sinfonia Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Jyväskylä Sinfonia}})

Might fail WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Sources may be available in written in the Finnish language. Has been tagged for improvement for 8 years. A Guy into Books (talk) 12:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

:Keep: Robotranslation of [https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffi.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FJyv%25C3%25A4skyl%25C3%25A4_Sinfonia&edit-text=&act=url fi-wiki version] lists claims against at least NMUSIC #3 (platinum albums) and #5 (multiple albums by major publishers), supported by Allmusic[http://www.allmusic.com/artist/jyv%C3%A4skyl%C3%A4-sinfonia-mn0002200754] and the Association of Finnish Symphony Orchestras[http://www.sinfoniaorkesterit.fi/en/orchestra/?id=36]. Also appears to be known as the "Sinfonia Finlandia Jyväskylä"[https://books.google.com/books?id=vmNcAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT88] and "Sinfonia Finlandia"[http://www.allmusic.com/album/gounod-symphonies-nos-1-2-mw0001853657] -- but not the "Finlandia Sinfonietta"[https://books.google.com/books?id=iUQDFlj1ykkC&pg=PA100]. Not much in the way of reviews readily visible from Google / GBooks, but at least some of their releases appear to have significant RS coverage[https://www.naxos.com/reviews/reviewslist.asp?catalogueid=8.572731&languageid=EN][https://www.naxos.com/reviews/reviewslist.asp?catalogueid=8.572634&languageid=EN]. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 13:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete we do not do articles on organizations built on their own websites.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

• Comment Added a number of sources. Mr. Magoo (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep -- a professional orchestra with a number of noted recordings. The article has been sufficiently improved in the course of this AfD for me to iVote as "Keep". An acceptable stub at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep. Sufficiently notable. No real argument put forward for deletion. --Michig (talk) 07:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep - it is sufficiently sourced, and passes GNG. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

::*Note - I rm the templates because this afd appears to settle issues of notability, and there are sufficient sources now ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.