Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KRR Minigun

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[KRR Minigun]]=

:{{la|KRR Minigun}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/KRR_Minigun Stats])

:({{Find sources|KRR Minigun}})

Article based entirely on a 1985 patent, which is a WP:PRIMARY source as far as WP:GNG is concerned. I can't find any independent sources. Someone not using his real name (talk) 07:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect to minigun. Not enough coverage of this firearm to justify its own article. Andrew327 12:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - fails WP:GNG per above; not IMO a likely search term. Ansh666 06:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. The only sources of information for this gun on the internet appears to be Wikipedia, Wikipedia mirrors and a lone patent site. I say we delete it. If someone wants to restore it later with better references, then that would be fine with me.--RAF910 (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.