Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kajukenfu
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
=[[Kajukenfu]]=
:{{la|Kajukenfu}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Kajukenfu}})
Non-notable martial art - created as a variation - not wide spread. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 12:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There is no significant independent coverage and nothing to show this meets WP:MANOTE. Apparently this style had 3 schools, hardly significant. Papaursa (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable and not properly sourced.--DThomsen8 (talk) 02:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note The article of the founder of the style (created by the same user at the same time) is also undergoing AfD (please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Rogelio Laranang Sr..Peter Rehse (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable style that fails WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.