Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalampadan

=[[Kalampadan]]=

:{{la|Kalampadan}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Kalampadan}})

Zero refs, zero RS gnews hits, zero RS gbooks hits. Non-notable. Tagged for notability and lack of refs since 2010. Created by a 1-article-edited-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not notable. Veryhuman (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete Article has been given plenty of time to develop and improve, but nothing here to make the topic notable.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete: I was unable to verify this. SL93 (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - I [http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Kalampadan%22&num=50#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Kalampadan%22+-wikipedia+-babylon+-facebook+-scribd&pbx=1&oq=%22Kalampadan%22+-wikipedia+-babylon+-facebook+-scribd&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=2902l8861l1l9360l8l8l0l0l0l0l141l939l2.6l8l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=d4aea2a5825eafc1&biw=1280&bih=823 found a few references to this surname online], but none of what I saw were reliable. It's verifiable, but not notable. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.