Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanwal Feroze
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America1000 16:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Kanwal Feroze]]=
:{{la|Kanwal Feroze}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Kanwal Feroze}})
Tamgha-i-Imtiaz is not enough for stand-alone article. No in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Apart from the sources already provided in the article that have entire paragraphs on him. The fact that he's a recipient of a civilian award and is a PhD. Here's: [http://nation.com.pk/lahore/05-Nov-2010/dr-kanwal-feroze-felicitated The Nation] & [https://tribune.com.pk/story/532191/pak-tea-house-regulars-of-the-past-visit-the-present/ Express Tribune] - Mfarazbaig (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: To discuss about the newly-found sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 03:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It would appear that he is notable with the new sources. Dysklyver 08:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously passes notability criteria. Prominent writer, having received multiple national awards (see [http://nation.com.pk/lahore/05-Nov-2010/dr-kanwal-feroze-felicitated]). The AfD underscores the persistent problem of systematic bias at Wikipedia, if it had been a US author honoured by US presidential medal the treatment had most likely been different. --Soman (talk) 10:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.