Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Bill

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Karen Bill]]=

:{{la|Karen Bill}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Karen_Bill Stats])

:({{Find sources|Karen Bill}})

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX Peter Rehse (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete The only source is a link to her fight record--an unimpressive 4 wins and 9 losses. She fails to meet WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails NBOX and GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 18:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete as per PRehse although there were [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rita+Koiral%22&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&biw=1019&bih=595&tbm=nws&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=RG0TVIbPNcmKsQTsjoFQ&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAw&dpr=1.5#q=%22Karen+Bill%22+(boxing+OR+boxer)+(site%3Anytimes.com+OR+site%3Ausatoday.com+OR+site%3Aphiladelphiainquirer.com+OR+site%3Atime.com+OR+site%3Amiamiherald.com+OR+site%3Apittsburghpostgazette.com+OR+site%3Achicagotribune.com+OR+site%3Alatimes.com+OR+site%3Asfgate.com+OR+site%3Awsj.com+OR+site%3Amercurynews.com+OR+site%3Awashingtonpost.com+OR+site%3Asuntimes.com+OR+site%3Anj.com+OR+site%3Aboston.com+OR+site%3Anydailynews.com+OR+site%3Adenverpost.com+OR+site%3Anpr.org+OR+site%3Abaltimoresun.com+OR+site%3Acsmonitor.com) several mentions here], but insufficient to meet the GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.