Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Infanger (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Karl Infanger]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Infanger}}

:{{la|Karl Infanger}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Karl_Infanger_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Karl Infanger}})

Created by an editor placed under a community ban from new article creation for defying notability criteria, this is typical of his efforts: recreating an article for a subject AfDed in 2007. Then as now, this NN player with an ephemeral career in the mid-minors fails NHOCKEY going away (the article, following another typical stunt from Dolovis, falsely claims that the subject made the league All-Star Team in 1999, instead simply being one of a few dozen players to play in the all-star game), no evidence he meets the GNG. Ravenswing 13:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY, per above. Shelbystripes (talk) 23:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete fails NHOCKEY and no other GNG. Montanabw^(talk) 06:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.