Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Wood

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Kate Wood]]=

:{{la|Kate Wood}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kate_Wood Stats])

:({{Find sources|Kate Wood}})

Notability not established. No (reliable) secondary sources provided to show notability TheOriginalSoni (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

delete When did we start running adverts? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
The worst bit is that I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kate_Wood&diff=560270041&oldid=560269848 already] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kate_Wood&diff=560270092&oldid=560270041 cut] significant rubbish from it. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Article does not cite any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.