Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Meyer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

=[[Kathleen Meyer]]=

:{{la|Kathleen Meyer}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kathleen_Meyer Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kathleen Meyer}})

Most of the references are primary sources, or unreliable e.g. Amazon. Therefore this clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO Joseph2302 (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep actually an important writer. See the WorldCat listing at [http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n88217049]. Works translated into several lanugages. Adequate reviews. The article needs rewriting---too much of it is a summary of the contents. DGG ( talk ) 16:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep DGG sums it up perfectly, as this is not the only article that the author has written about a writer that has summaries of the work that are longer than the biography portion of the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.