Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Staudt

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 01:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Kathleen Staudt]]=

:{{la|Kathleen Staudt}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kathleen_Staudt Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kathleen Staudt}})

I can't find anything to establish the subject notability. All I can see is self-published works. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

I looked up the books and most of them are not self-published; they are published by university presses like University of Arizona and University of Texas. 18:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.36.227 (talk)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 05:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep In this academic area, the h-index of 24 given by Google Scholar for the subject looks like a reasonably good indicator that she meets WP:PROF#C1 (though I'm open to correction if other sources suggests that this is one of the cases where GScholar has got things wrong). PWilkinson (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:PROF#C5: she holds an endowed chair at UTEP, as I just added to the article. Probably she also passes other clauses of WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR but this one is clear enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per {{u|David Eppstein}}'s point about WP:PROF#C5. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.