Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Knuttila (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Kathryn Knuttila}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Kathryn Knuttila}})

Subject does not meet any WP:GNG as a former beauty pageant contestant. Let'srun (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Beauty pageants, and Minnesota. Let'srun (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
• :Delete nothing found for notability [https://www.tcdailyplanet.net/kathryn-knuttila-miss-minnesota/], newspaper Q&A, and this [https://www.dl-online.com/news/holy-rosary-turns-100-years-old-this-month], her school turned 100. No sourcing we can use, non-notable as a pageant winner. Oaktree b (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete as per the nomination. The article fails WP:GNG and the references aren't much better. The latter two bring you to dead websites, the second is a passing mention and the first is a... Birth index? Really? IncompA 00:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per the nomination and {{np|Oaktree b}}. Checked the web, news, the archive, and WP:TWL - no dice. The only thing of substance I could find myself that wasn't already mentioned above was [https://www.wadenapj.com/news/miss-minnesota-visiting-wadena-nov-6], which is a press release. —Sirdog (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete on WP:GNG/WP:BLP1E grounds, and as per the above arguments regarding sourcing. SportingFlyer T·C 11:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I don't seem anything notable here.Mason (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. JayJay^{What did I do?} 19:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.