Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Anderson

:{{la|Katie Anderson}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Anderson}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Katie Anderson}})

Contested PROD, child actor; does not appear notable, lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources. WP:BIO, I have partcular concern over the BLP details repeatedly added to the article without references.  Chzz  ►  02:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

• Note: no reason to nominate Anderson and not Claudia Colling for the same reason. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 04:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

:Agreed, nominate her if you wish.David V Houston (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

• Delete don't see any notabilityDavid V Houston (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns, where this youngster has whatever notability the cast of that production might, and where she is already listed in their cast. A seperate article about her is too soon. Her career is just beginning and currently she fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. If or when this changes, an article about her might be considered... but not just yet. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
• Redirect per Michael Schmidt. The only acting credit this actress is known for is not notable outside of the country yet. Plus the article is not referenced at all. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 03:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.