Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaycee Records

:{{la|Kaycee Records}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Kaycee Records}})

non notable record label WuhWuzDat 14:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

:*I tidied the article up, cutting out fluff and adding content from the sources. These are mainstream national newspapers, so perhaps establish notability. But the company is just a start-up at this stage, possibly using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Not sure about this one... Aymatth2 (talk) 16:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

• Weak keep, if for no other reason than to help fill out the Nigerian record labels category.. it's still borderline as for as notability, but at least with Aymatth2's changes it's not a complete write-off,, -- œ^™ 21:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - Article needs work, particularly with respect to sourcing, but adds information and is suitably non-commercial for inclusion, in my judgement. Carrite (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.