Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Jolie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Keith Jolie]]=

:{{la|Keith Jolie}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keith_Jolie Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Keith Jolie}})

I looked hard to find some media coverage of this singer/songwriter. There is an article in his hometown newspaper that isn't on line, but that's okay. Another newspaper has a couple of lines stating that he performed at a festival. The CBC references are user-created profiles (not working right now because the site is undergoing changes, but they'll be back). Snapd is a magazine that carries event listings, and pages of photos of events with captions - not reviews or detailed reports. The National Archives link proves that his album exists, and was published in Canada, but the archives takes every such item, not just notable ones. I couldn't find any album or performance reviews, or any interviews or features in magazines. I also couldn't find any news articles or reviews about his band Endsville. I'd be please to withdraw this nomination if I've missed something. —Anne Delong (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. Nothing here constitutes an automatic pass of any WP:NMUSIC criterion, and as nominator notes the referencing is not solid enough to clear WP:GNG. And I came up completely empty on a ProQuest search, which means there's no discernible prospect of salvaging it. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.