Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Lu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Kevin Lu]]=

:{{la|Kevin Lu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kevin_Lu Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kevin Lu}})

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

I really don't see a claim that he is notable as an academic. The claim to notability appears to be more as an author and businessperson. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete having his work published by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal is not enough to make him notable. We lack sources to show anything else might.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as I actually reviewed this years ago and it simply has not changed at all, nothing at all for any applicable notability and the noticeable vandalism along with also nothing potentially convincing is all enough for deleting. I would've frankly PRODed instead. SwisterTwister talk 01:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.