Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Elements
=[[Key Elements]]=
:{{la|Key Elements}} – (
:({{Find sources|Key Elements}})
I can't find substantial RS coverage on gnews and gbooks, and Allmusic never heard of this band. Not to be confused with the Cornell band of the same name. Zero refs. Zero independent ELs. Tagged for notability and for reliance on primary sources for over 3 years, and as an orphan. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. [http://www.asiaone.com/Wine%252CDine%2B%2526%2BUnwind/Unwind/Music/Story/A1Story20070519-6058.html] and [http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/entertainmentfeatures/view/432269/1/.html] are some monitor mentions I found but well short of the coverage needed for inclusion. -- Whpq (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No significant coverage found. No other indication of notability.--Michig (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.