Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid Comedies

:{{la|Kid Comedies}} ([{{fullurl:Kid Comedies|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid Comedies}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

• Poorly founded topic, OR, lack of encyclopedic tone or focus. FuriousFreddy (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete have no clue what the article's about, everything's all over the place. Insuffcient info/importance. And as per FuriousFreddy, lack of encyclopaedic tone/focus and structure. --Shaggy9872004 (talk) 05:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep. While I admit the article is bad, it has potential, as things like this are generally sourceable. None of the reasons given, except OR, are reasons by themselves to delete an article. Random89 05:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete The content of the article (narrow) is inappropriate for the title (broad). Article not encyclopedic. There is a lot of personal opinion or WP:OR commentary, and the whole thing really doesn't make sense. --- Taroaldo (talk) 09:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete lack of encyclopaedic tone, but most importantly OR concerns Fritzpoll (talk) 14:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Our Gang or History of cinema: There is nothing wrong with noting the brief vogue of knock-off Max Sennetts, but the name is OR and will fragment the discussion. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.