Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids Who Rip

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

=[[Kids Who Rip]]=

:{{la|Kids Who Rip}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kids_Who_Rip Stats])

:({{Find sources|Kids Who Rip}})

This is a DVD series and sells merchandise, but I can't find evidence to support it being a notable company/series. It has been tagged for notability for nearly six years, so hopefully we can now establish its notability one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 07:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|Rod Parmenter, Kids-Who-Rip}})

:({{Find sources|Kids-Who-Rip, DVD review}})

:({{Find sources|Kids-Who-Rip, Video}})

:({{Find sources|Action-World-Entertainment, Kids-Who-Rip}})


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


  • Delete Though my guess is that the DVDs are probably entertaining, I could find only passing mentions in reliable sources, except for a longer "local business" type article in a Seattle newspaper. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.