Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Rudd

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Kim Rudd]]=

:{{la|Kim Rudd}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Kim Rudd}})

Article was proposed for deletion, with the reason "nominated candidate in an election that hasn't been called yet; per WP:POLITICIAN electoral candidates aren't inherently notable until they win." I agree with the reason (the only significant third-party coverage I can find is news reports announcing that Rudd would be the candidate), however as PROD has previously been contested on this article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kim_Rudd&diff=313470551&oldid=313469786] I've nominated it at AFD. snigbrook (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete - "saved our community" is a hallmark of a press release, not an encyclopedia article about a notable person. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete seemingly non-notable politician where someone seems to have posted a political ad.--Buridan (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC).

:Delete Does not meet notability criteria. Jim Carmel (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.