Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimi Reichenberg

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Kimi Reichenberg]]=

:{{la|Kimi Reichenberg}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kimi_Reichenberg Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kimi Reichenberg}})

Her acting credits don't satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be IMDb, so we can't have articles just sourced to it. Beyond this, a bunch of minor roles just does not make someone a significant actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing from reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG, and they definitely don't pass WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.