Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitabu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - The Herald (here I am) 13:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Kitabu]]=

:{{la|Kitabu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kitabu Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Kitabu}})

Shady-looking software with no sources at all. Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. Shii (tock) 13:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

What do you mean by that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epubtools (talk • contribs) 14:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep. There are 13 sources in the article, in a list labelled "References". From before the AFD, from before the earlier PROD. For example [http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/7-ebook-readers-mac-compared/ this ebook readers comparison] is one, with some material on Kitabu as one legitimate alternative to consider. "Shady-looking"??? is not a valid deletion reason. --do ncr am 02:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't consider "makeuseof.com" a reliable source, nor any of the other websites listed. Shii (tock) 11:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Its also listed as a suggested reader in Darthmouth College [http://researchguides.dartmouth.edu/c.php?g=59713&p=382810] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epubtools (talk • — Preceding undated comment added 22:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 04:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam ^Sing! (please WP:PING when replying) 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep and hack out the original research. Software has enough RS ([http://dottech.org/126365/mac-os-x-review-kitabu-epub-reader-app/ here's one]) establishing notability. Pax 07:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.