Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleómenes Stamatiades Concha

:{{la|Kleómenes Stamatiades Concha}} ([{{fullurl:Kleómenes Stamatiades Concha|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleómenes Stamatiades Concha}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

A 15-year-old actor. Page contains lots of tivia and little substance - borderline speedy deletion candidate. Created by an unregistered user in place of a redirect; I was feeling generous and moved it to a separate page (but the user didn't respond to my message and didn't edit the page since). Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. As the nom indicates, this started out a redirect page that was hijacked by an IP user to create a new article. Since we don't want IP users to create new articles, particularly about living people, we should probably get rid of this. In addition, the page is poorly sourced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Apparently tried it under that spelling first on [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Kle%C3%B3menes+Stamatiades+Concha%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi= es.Wikipedia]. Absolutely no hits anywhere. BLP cannot be sourced or verified. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 10:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

:Hi... I'm really sorry I didnt answer... but I've been busy... I've answered in the discussion...

:I think this page is not violating any law... I mean, it is an enciclopedic article... it is a 15-year-old actor...

:I think it is a good article, considering everything it says (obviously you have the last word.)

:And yes, Ive the same problem with es.wikipedia... But as I said before, I just dont know why do you want to delete this article...

:I mean, I'm a fan, and I saw that there wasnt a page for this actor, so I created one, with 100% veridic data.

:I created in spanish, and in english...

:I'm new at wikipedia, so I dont know all the rules, and laws... so, please, can you help me to know why is this article a bad article...

:what may I change???

:(This is what I posted at the discussion)

:Im really sorry I havent answer... Thank you ver much for changing my article...

:I' really dont know why you want to delete this page, I think it is enciclopedic...

:Of coarse, I had the same problem with es.wikipedia... But I really dont know why you want to delete it, I mean; I'm a fan, and I saw that there wasnt a page for this actor, so, I created one...

:I think it is an enciclopedic theme... it is a 15 year old actor...

:I think it is not promotion... (of coarse you have the last word)

:well... I'm really sorry I didnt answer this before....

:Thank you very much again... 189.141.55.238 (talk) 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

::What we ourselves found when trying to research the article is that we are having difficulties in confirming anything at the page. What you would need to do to answer the concerns is show that the actor has been written about in either newspapers, magazine, news reports, or in books... and then include those sources in the artcle. Please read WP:BIO, WP:V, and WP:RS to better understand what conditions must be met for inclusion in Wikipedia. We're here to help... MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 04:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

::The only reference in the article is a personal page at http://www.kleomenes.com/ -- and that has no information about the person, just a drawing of a Volkswagen 181 Safari. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, then, If I post the issues of the magazines, and the youtube direction for some videos,will it be ok??

I have them... well, some of them...

hope this helps...

just adding, the page has been under constrution, like for 3 months... when I discovered it...

So, I will add the information...

(Can I write youtube adresses??) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.141.55.238 (talk) 02:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

:YouTube and social networking sites, blogs, forums, etc. are not considered reliable sources so please don't add these as references, thank you. Astronaut (talk) 03:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Absolutely no evidence of notability. Just 3 Google hits (all at wikipedia). Quite possibly vanispamcruftisement. Astronaut (talk) 03:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

mmm, then I can't do anything... maybe when kleomenes.com is open... 189.141.55.238 (talk) 18:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.