Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koopcas

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Koopcas]]=

:{{la|Koopcas}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koopcas}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Koopcas}})

non notable software. unsourced and very few google hits - nothing to establish notability. noq (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete The fact that there are no third party sources indicates, that is a non-notable software. Armbrust Talk Contribs 19:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Move, retitle, and Repurpose The software itself is clearly non-notable -- I could not even find anything in Google, using several variations . But the software is a product of Cebu People's Multi-Purpose Cooperative [http://www.mycoop.ph/], which may well be notable--it has at least a 3rd party news ref. [http://www.mb.com.ph/node/131017] and some mentions--there may also be refs for some of its other projects. DGG ( talk ) 23:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Consider The software is somehow notable -- I am an employee of Dumanjug Multi-Purpose Cooperative, even though this software is not widely known all around the world, but here in the Philippines the cooperative sector has known well this software for providing a cost effective alternative to costly proprietary accounting softwares and really helps cooperatives in the operation. 22:38 5 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.22.249 (talk)

:::this may be, but we can not really have an article on it without some evidence that shows it. DGG ( talk ) 15:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GedUK  12:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete, no significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:46, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Retain, we have added a link in the Wiki Article about a very recent implementation of Koopcas to a big cooperative in Northern Luzon Philippines, they are the first cooperative that publishes to the web regarding their implementation of KoopCAS, more cooperatives will follow soon. This can be referred to as making this software notable. Please do consider retaining this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.71.133 (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

:Comment A link to a blog saying you sold a copy does not establish notability. See WP:reliable sources noq (talk) 07:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

:Comment We have added a new link directly to the official website of one of the big cooperatives in Cebu, FCCT has recently signed contract with CPMPC for KoopCAS, maybe this could be considered being notable. As I have said earlier that more cooperatives who have choosen to implement KoopCAS are slowly publishing it to the web. I hope this could be considered being notable. Please do consider keeping this article on this prestigious website Wikipedia. Thanks and more power to you all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.71.133 (talk) 09:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

::Comment Again, a brief mention on a customer website does not qualify as a WP:reliable source for establishing notability. noq (talk) 11:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.