Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koy-bas
=[[Koy-bas]]=
:{{la|Koy-bas}} ([{{fullurl:Koy-bas|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koy-bas}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
The information in this article is poorly presented and already exists in the main Besbarmak article. The article, on a certain part of the dish, discusses the entire Besbarmak serving ritual, which is covered in the Besbarmak article. Therefore, the Koy-bas article is redundant and doesn't need to exist. Oral Thrush (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvula! (talk • contribs) 2009/01/12 05:19:15
:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- When you see duplicate articles that are "redundant", then Wikipedia:duplicate articles should be your first port of call. This is Articles for deletion. Deletion forms no part whatsoever of dealing with duplicate articles, a process that doesn't even require one to have the tools available to an editor with an account, let alone administrator tools. Uncle G (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest withdrawing this nomination and boldly redirecting or merging the page. Graymornings(talk) 07:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.