Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krisztina Morvai

:{{la|Krisztina Morvai}} ([{{fullurl:Krisztina Morvai|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krisztina Morvai}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I created the article but abandoned it as soon as I realized she was not notable (lack of sources). The article is now used a source of libel like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krisztina_Morvai&diff=294995192&oldid=294994950 this.] Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - leader of the third most powerful party of her country, Hungary. Sources are aplenty and serious enough ([http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/5372983/Feminine-face-of-Hungarys-far-Right-Jobbik-movement-seeks-MEPs-seat.html], [http://www.liberation.fr/economie/0101565764-la-hongrie-broie-du-noir]). --RCS (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

::{{user|RCS}} is the one who posted the antisemitism category. His only edits to the article is to label Krisztina as an antisemite. I don't think his vote carries weight because the only reason he wants the article is that he can continue to post libelous statements. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

:::I don't think {{User|Falastine fee Qalby}} vote carries weight because the only reason he wants the article deleted is that Mrs. Morvai, like many outspoken antisemites, is also being very pro-Palestinian indeed ([http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/02/02/the-anti-israel-neo-fascists-of-hungary]).--RCS (talk) 21:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

• Keep- Person is notable! "Krisztina Morvai is a Hungarian lawyer and Human Rights lecturer, who is standing for the political party Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom (Movement for a Better Hungary) in the 2009 European Parliament elections." This article exists on the German [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krisztina_Morvai], Hungarian [http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morvai_Krisztina] and on Swedish [http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krisztina_Morvai] wikipedia too. There are several references on the internet about her. She is the member of the European Parliament, see the results of the European Parliament election, 2009 (Hungary)B@xter ⁹ 21:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy keep – there is no basis to delete this article. Being a target for libel is not a reason for deletion, especially when there are alternatives to remedy this situation, such as blocking or protecting the article. MuZemike 21:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Kristina Morvai meets the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians criteria] for politicians. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - meets notability requirements Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 22:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Notable, both for her political status and prejudiced viewpoints Avi (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep, multiple reliable sources about multiple notable acts. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:28, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Snowball keep, FFQ is way off base here. <eleland/talkedits> 06:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Snow keep per, er, everyone. I've rarely seen such a conclusive case for WP:SNOW.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 08:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep This should be kept but I think the controversial alleged quotation should be entirely removed and simply referred to as an allegation of obscenity and antisemitism and a denial. Now she's the leader of a Eurosceptic party in the EU Parliament it would be absurd to deny that she exists! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardmulholland (talk • contribs)
• Keep I also think the word 'smeared' is an unfortunate -indeed potentially libellous- usage from two points of view. First, from her point of view- 'to smear' is 'to libel'. And second, from a zionists point of view - zionism is a respectable though controversial political point of view; to suggest that someone can be 'smeared' as a zionist is to suggest that zionism is, in itself, less than respectable. 'criticised' is a much better word in this context because it clearly does not seek to libel either her or zionism! User:Gerardmulholland 11:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
• Speedily Keep Much as I dislike her political party and her right-wing conservative views, she was democratically elected yesterday as a Member of the European Parliament, so therefore there can be no doubt about it: must be speedily kept asap. Tris2000 (talk) 10:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.