Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kudeku

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 19:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Kudeku]]=

:{{la|Kudeku}} ([{{fullurl:Kudeku|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kudeku}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:NEOLOGISM; Unsourced, potential hoax Falcon8765 (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable neologism. Edward321 (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete The article is completely unsourced, and does not explain why it is notable. Google and Google Scholar have zero hits for any independent reliable sources that might confirm any of the purported meanings. It is probably a hoax. - 91.187.64.57 (talk) 02:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete as per nom. Bonfire of vanities (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Seems like WP:MADEUP to me. Jafeluv (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Definate WP:NEO, possible hoax. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.