Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulangattil Family

:{{la|Kulangattil Family}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Kulangattil Family}})

A complete absence of reliable sources, and a total failure of Google Books to produce sources, makes me think that we are dealing with a non-notable topic whose content comes from tradition, lore, and original research. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• Delete, lack of sources. Indian sub-continent articles frequently leave a lot to be desired, and this is one of them. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
• clearly documented article. Many Malayalam books quoting these facts.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulangattil (talk • contribs) 05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

::*Note: Above editor is the author of the article. — Abhishek  ^Talk 17:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. [http://www.google.co.in/search?q=Kulangattil+Family&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Google books shows zero results]. We are definitely dealing with OR. — Abhishek  ^Talk 17:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable local family masquerading as a historical family of importance. Salih (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.